Keyword summary
34%2 analyzed articles/videos2,336 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jury Selection results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Availability Heuristic, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 10.7% saturation with 752 hits. Analysis detected 4,833 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,008 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 24% (28,787 of 37,536 keywords). This Jury Selection is better (less manipulative) than 76.70% of the peer group.
Jury Selection
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
24%Jury Selection (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 7,008
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

23% percentile
025507510023.3% percentile
2.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 4.1%4.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 8.3%8.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 10.7%10.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.2%3.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 10.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos