Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video335 analyzed words
BS Summary: These July 4 Performance results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, In-Group Bias, and Quote-first Misdirection, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 29.6% saturation with 396 hits. Analysis detected 2,249 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,340 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6% and a BS Rank of 87% (5,161 of 37,536 keywords). This July 4 Performance is worse (more manipulative) than 86.30% of the peer group.
July 4 Performance
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
87%July 4 Performance (selected)6%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,340
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

86% percentile
025507510086.3% percentile
6.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 29.6%29.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 20.6%20.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.0%4.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 10.3%10.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 9.8%9.8%Tu QuoqueSitewide 0.2%Keyword 8.7%8.7%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 9.4%9.4%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Keyword 8.7%8.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Ad Hominem: Keyword 29.6%, sitewide 2.2%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 20.6%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 15.9%In-Group Bias: Keyword 10.4%, sitewide 6.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 1.4%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 9.1%Tu Quoque: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 0.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 2.0%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Straw Man: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 0.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 5.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 0.8%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 4.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 3.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Ad HominemSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos