Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Julia Roberts results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Self-Serving Bias , and Negativity Bias , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 10.1% saturation with 882 hits . Analysis detected 5,390 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,774 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 36,701 keywords). This Julia Roberts is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Julia Roberts
Keyword details
Total words: 8,774
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 10.1% 10.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 10.1%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.5% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.0%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst