Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Judge Cant Tie Funds From Usda To Compliance With Other Policies results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Politically Left Leaning Bias, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 18.7% saturation with 280 hits. Analysis detected 1,566 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,496 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Judge Cant Tie Funds From Usda To Compliance With Other Policies is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Judge Cant Tie Funds From Usda To Compliance With Other Policies
Keyword details
Total words: 1,496
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 8.3%8.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 18.7%18.7%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Keyword 9.9%9.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 8.3%8.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 4.6%4.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 12.9%12.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 18.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 12.9%, sitewide 15.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 2.0%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 0.8%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 4.0%False Dilemma: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 1.5%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.7%Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Straw Man: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.1%Circular Reasoning: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 0.6%Begging the Question: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.7%Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos