Keyword summary
30% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,438 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jude Bellingham results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Framing Effect , and Negativity Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 22% saturation with 1,150 hits . Analysis detected 3,981 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,218 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 42% (21,892 of 37,536 keywords). This Jude Bellingham is better (less manipulative) than 58.30% of the peer group. Jude Bellingham
Keyword details
Total words: 5,218
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
42% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 41.7% percentile 2.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.2% 5.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 22.0% 22.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.1% 5.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 22.0%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 6.7% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.4% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.0% Primacy Effect: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 0.9% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst