Keyword summary
62% 2 analyzed articles/videos 685 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Juan Ciscomani results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Negativity Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 16.2% saturation with 832 hits . Analysis detected 6,466 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,140 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 62% (14,539 of 37,536 keywords). This Juan Ciscomani is worse (more manipulative) than 61.30% of the peer group. Juan Ciscomani
Keyword details
Total words: 5,140
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
61% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 61.3% percentile 3.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 15.3% 15.3% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 16.2% 16.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 14.2% 14.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.1% 7.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 13.8% 13.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 16.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 13.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 15.9% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 15.3%, sitewide 1.4% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 14.2%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 7.5% Ad Hominem: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 2.2% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Straw Man: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 0.9% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 0.5% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.1% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst