Keyword summary
86% 2 analyzed articles/videos 587 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jpmorgan Chase And Co results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Halo Effect , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 19.6% saturation with 694 hits . Analysis detected 3,398 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,540 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 58% (14,717 of 34,561 keywords). This Jpmorgan Chase And Co is worse (more manipulative) than 57.40% of the peer group. Jpmorgan Chase And Co
Keyword details
Total words: 3,540
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
57% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 57.4% percentile 3.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 19.6% 19.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.4% 4.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 4.4% 4.4% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 6.0% 6.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 26.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 19.6%, sitewide 6.0% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 6.7% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 3.3% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.5% Begging the Question: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst