Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video802 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Journalistic Objectivity results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, False Dilemma, and Framing Effect, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 7.6% saturation with 243 hits. Analysis detected 2,324 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,208 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 45% (18,874 of 34,207 keywords). This Journalistic Objectivity is better (less manipulative) than 55.20% of the peer group.
Journalistic Objectivity
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
45%Journalistic Objectivity (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,208
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

45% percentile
025507510044.8% percentile
2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 5.4%5.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 6.8%6.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Middle GroundSitewide 0.1%Keyword 5.2%5.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.7%2.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.3%1.3%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Keyword 5.4%5.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 7.5%False Dilemma: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 1.5%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 5.2%Middle Ground: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 0.1%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 3.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.4%Straw Man: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.7%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Blind-Spot Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 0.2%Special Pleading: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.3%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos

False balance45%
Wikipedia0%4/20/2026, 6:49:33 PM