Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 795 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Josh Frydenberg results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation) , Biased Writer Voice , and Hindsight Bias , with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 12.4% saturation with 395 hits . Analysis detected 3,210 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,180 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 53% (17,942 of 37,536 keywords). This Josh Frydenberg is worse (more manipulative) than 52.20% of the peer group. Josh Frydenberg
Keyword details
Total words: 3,180
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
52% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 52.2% percentile 3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.4% 5.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 8.9% 8.9% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 8.4% 8.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 12.4% 12.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 12.4%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 9.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 0.8% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 5.3% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 1.4% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.5% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst