Keyword summary
12%3 analyzed articles/videos2,493 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Josh Elliott results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Appeal to Emotion, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 5.9% saturation with 920 hits. Analysis detected 7,542 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,603 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 3% (36,658 of 37,536 keywords). This Josh Elliott is better (less manipulative) than 97.70% of the peer group.
Josh Elliott
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
3%Josh Elliott (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 15,603
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

2% percentile
02550751002.3% percentile
1.2% BS Score3 analyzed articles15.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 5.9%5.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.2%4.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.7%2.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.2%0.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.4%1.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 3.1%Indoctrination: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate