Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,210 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Joseph V Cuffari results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Unattributed Quote, and Self-Serving Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13% saturation with 631 hits. Analysis detected 2,653 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,840 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 21% (29,434 of 36,885 keywords). This Joseph V Cuffari is better (less manipulative) than 79.80% of the peer group.
Joseph V Cuffari
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
21%Joseph V Cuffari (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,840
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

20% percentile
025507510020.2% percentile
1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 6.6%6.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.9%1.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 13.0%13.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 13.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 1.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 3.7%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.4%Horn Effect: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos