Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,107 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jorge Rodriguez results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 19.2% saturation with 848 hits. Analysis detected 3,722 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,428 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 49% (18,359 of 35,444 keywords). This Jorge Rodriguez is better (less manipulative) than 51.80% of the peer group.
Jorge Rodriguez
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
49%Jorge Rodriguez (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,428
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

48% percentile
025507510048.2% percentile
2.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 9.0%9.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 8.0%8.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.8%4.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 5.8%5.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 19.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.0%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.5%Primacy Effect: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate