Keyword summary
66%1 analyzed article/video1,319 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jonathan De Barros results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Self-Serving Bias, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.7% saturation with 544 hits. Analysis detected 3,892 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,957 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 45% (20,818 of 37,536 keywords). This Jonathan De Barros is better (less manipulative) than 55.50% of the peer group.
Jonathan De Barros
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
45%Jonathan De Barros (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,957
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

45% percentile
025507510044.5% percentile
2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 10.4%10.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.6%5.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.8%1.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 6.4%6.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 5.5%5.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 13.8%13.8%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 9.1%9.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 10.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 13.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 9.1%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 3.7%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 0.8%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 0.0%Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%Begging the Question: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.4%Burden of Proof: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos