Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,089 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jonathan Cervas results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 27.7% saturation with 906 hits. Analysis detected 4,464 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,267 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.9% and a BS Rank of 86% (5,263 of 37,536 keywords). This Jonathan Cervas is worse (more manipulative) than 86.00% of the peer group.
Jonathan Cervas
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
86%Jonathan Cervas (selected)6%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,267
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

86% percentile
025507510086.0% percentile
5.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 17.1%17.1%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Keyword 13.7%13.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Keyword 9.9%9.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 9.6%9.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Keyword 6.2%6.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 6.8%6.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.5%0.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.2%1.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 27.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 15.9%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 17.1%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 15.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 13.7%, sitewide 2.0%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 11.1%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 1.9%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 6.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 1.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.5%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Nature: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos