Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 376 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jonathan Capehart results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination , Appeal to Authority , and Hasty Generalization , with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 26.2% saturation with 385 hits . Analysis detected 3,425 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,469 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 8% and a BS Rank of 92% (3,005 of 37,536 keywords). This Jonathan Capehart is worse (more manipulative) than 92.00% of the peer group. Jonathan Capehart
Keyword details
Total words: 1,469
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
92% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 92.0% percentile 8.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 21.8% 21.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 26.2% 26.2% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 11.3% 11.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 17.8% 17.8% Straw Man Sitewide 0.9% Keyword 10.1% 10.1% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 10.9% 10.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 17.8% 17.8% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Keyword 8.2% 8.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 11.3% 11.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 14.0% 14.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 11.3%, sitewide 26.9% In-Group Bias: Keyword 26.2%, sitewide 6.9% Indoctrination: Keyword 21.8%, sitewide 0.0% Negativity Bias: Keyword 14.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 17.8%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 17.8%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 10.9%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 11.6%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 11.3%, sitewide 5.3% Halo Effect: Keyword 11.1%, sitewide 6.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 10.9%, sitewide 2.2% Straw Man: Keyword 10.1%, sitewide 0.9% False Dilemma: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 1.5% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 7.5% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 1.9% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 5.2% Primacy Effect: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 0.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 0.8% Circular Reasoning: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 0.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst
MS NOW 95% 12/19/2025, 2:37:05 PM