Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Jon Bernthal results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Overconfidence Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 12.7% saturation with 960 hits . Analysis detected 5,737 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,558 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 35,343 keywords). This Jon Bernthal is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Jon Bernthal
Keyword details
Total words: 7,558
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.9% 5.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 12.7% 12.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 9.8% 9.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 12.7%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 7.5% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 4.6% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.8% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.1% Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.3% Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst