Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Jon & Kate Plus 8 results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Halo Effect, and Self-Serving Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 10.9% saturation with 389 hits. Analysis detected 2,868 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,568 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Jon & Kate Plus 8 is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Jon & Kate Plus 8
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
⁠0%Jon & Kate Plus 8 (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,568
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 4.0%4.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 10.7%10.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.3%0.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 10.9%10.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.3%3.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 4.6%4.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.1%0.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 10.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 5.3%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 3.7%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.5%Burden of Proof: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.4%Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos