Keyword summary
⁠0%3 analyzed articles/videos1,952 analyzed words
BS Summary: These John Ternus results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Optimism Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 23.1% saturation with 1,600 hits. Analysis detected 7,617 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,924 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠59% (15,635 of 37,536 keywords). This John Ternus is worse (more manipulative) than 58.30% of the peer group.
John Ternus
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠59%John Ternus (selected)4%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

58% percentile
025507510058.3% percentile
3.2% BS Score3 analyzed articles6.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 4.6%4.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 23.1%23.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 6.3%6.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.3%1.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 8.2%8.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 4.8%4.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 26.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 23.1%, sitewide 6.7%Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.9%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 4.6%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 5.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 3.7%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 1.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos