Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video407 analyzed words
BS Summary: These John Tavares results contain 12 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Recency Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 10.3% saturation with 168 hits. Analysis detected 744 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,628 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of 68% (12,033 of 37,536 keywords). This John Tavares is worse (more manipulative) than 67.90% of the peer group.
John Tavares
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
68%John Tavares (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,628
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

68% percentile
025507510067.9% percentile
3.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.2%3.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 5.2%5.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 10.3%10.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 3.2%3.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 10.3%10.3%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Keyword 5.7%5.7%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Keyword 1.7%1.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Keyword 1.8%1.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 6.9%Recency Bias: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%Primacy Effect: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.8%Indoctrination: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos