Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 637 analyzed words
BS Summary: These John Strand results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Ad Hominem , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 33.2% saturation with 1,726 hits . Analysis detected 6,170 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,192 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 58% (15,804 of 37,533 keywords). This John Strand is worse (more manipulative) than 57.90% of the peer group. John Strand
Keyword details
Total words: 5,192
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
58% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 57.9% percentile 3.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 33.2% 33.2% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.1% 5.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 27.5% 27.5% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 10.0% 10.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 33.2%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Keyword 27.5%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 11.1% Ad Hominem: Keyword 10.0%, sitewide 2.2% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst