Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video846 analyzed words
BS Summary: These John Spaccarotelli results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias, Loss Aversion, and Status Quo Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 24.7% saturation with 627 hits. Analysis detected 4,457 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,538 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.6% and a BS Rank of 92% (3,298 of 37,536 keywords). This John Spaccarotelli is worse (more manipulative) than 91.20% of the peer group.
John Spaccarotelli
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
92%John Spaccarotelli (selected)8%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,538
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

91% percentile
025507510091.2% percentile
7.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Keyword 23.2%23.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 24.3%24.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 11.5%11.5%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Keyword 14.5%14.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 24.7%24.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 11.5%11.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 0.9%0.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 12.4%12.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 11.5%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 24.7%, sitewide 15.9%In-Group Bias: Keyword 24.3%, sitewide 6.9%Loss Aversion: Keyword 23.2%, sitewide 2.5%Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.5%, sitewide 19.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 14.5%, sitewide 2.2%Anecdotal: Keyword 12.4%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Keyword 11.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 10.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 4.0%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 7.5%Recency Bias: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.3%Bandwagon: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.4%Primacy Effect: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.9%Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos