Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These John Nielsen Gammon results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Hindsight Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 5.9% saturation with 319 hits. Analysis detected 2,008 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,433 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,533 keywords). This John Nielsen Gammon is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
John Nielsen Gammon
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
0%John Nielsen Gammon (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 5,433
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 5.9%5.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 5.4%5.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 4.6%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 1.4%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos