Keyword summary
91% 1 analyzed article/video 910 analyzed words
BS Summary: These John Mearsheimer results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Confirmation Bias , and Negativity Bias , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 20.1% saturation with 733 hits . Analysis detected 6,126 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,640 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of 71% (10,629 of 36,129 keywords). This John Mearsheimer is worse (more manipulative) than 70.60% of the peer group. John Mearsheimer
Keyword details
Total words: 3,640
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
71% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 70.6% percentile 4.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.0% 5.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 16.8% 16.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.7% 5.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 20.1% 20.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 15.9% 15.9% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Keyword 8.3% 8.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 13.6% 13.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 20.1%, sitewide 11.1% Negativity Bias: Keyword 13.6%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 16.8%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 15.9%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 12.4%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 1.9% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Slippery Slope: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 1.7% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.0% Ad Hominem: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 2.2% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 5.2% Straw Man: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 0.9% False Dilemma: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 1.5% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Indoctrination: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 3.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst