Keyword summary
19%1 analyzed article/video2,288 analyzed words
BS Summary: These John Martin Reservoir results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Pessimism Bias as the most egregious example at 4.7% saturation with 325 hits. Analysis detected 3,572 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,864 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 31% (26,193 of 37,536 keywords). This John Martin Reservoir is better (less manipulative) than 69.80% of the peer group.
John Martin Reservoir
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
31%John Martin Reservoir (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 6,864
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

30% percentile
025507510030.2% percentile
2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 4.6%4.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.5%4.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.7%3.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 2.7%2.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 5.2%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 3.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 0.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.1%Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos