Keyword summary
74%1 analyzed article/video1,383 analyzed words
BS Summary: These John Lynch results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Overconfidence Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 13.8% saturation with 574 hits. Analysis detected 3,398 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,149 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 57% (16,288 of 37,536 keywords). This John Lynch is worse (more manipulative) than 56.60% of the peer group.
John Lynch
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
57%John Lynch (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,149
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

57% percentile
025507510056.6% percentile
3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 13.8%13.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.8%3.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Keyword 4.8%4.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 7.1%7.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 19.2%Optimism Bias: Keyword 13.8%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 7.5%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 4.6%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.7%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 4.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 5.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.5%Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%Circular Reasoning: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.1%Horn Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.0%Burden of Proof: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos