Keyword summary
88%1 analyzed article/video1,485 analyzed words
BS Summary: These John Jacob Astor Iv results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Biased Writer Voice, and Anecdotal, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 27.9% saturation with 1,243 hits. Analysis detected 4,766 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,455 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of 67% (12,698 of 37,536 keywords). This John Jacob Astor Iv is worse (more manipulative) than 66.20% of the peer group.
John Jacob Astor Iv
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
67%John Jacob Astor Iv (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,455
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

66% percentile
025507510066.2% percentile
3.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.9%3.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 27.9%27.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 19.5%19.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 15.8%15.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.5%5.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.3%4.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.2%2.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Halo Effect: Keyword 27.9%, sitewide 6.7%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 26.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 19.5%, sitewide 0.5%Negativity Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 15.8%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.2%Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.1%Halo EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos