Keyword summary
⁠43%1 analyzed article/video707 analyzed words
BS Summary: These John Fetterman Republican Approval Dave Mccormick Pennsylvania Poll results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Confirmation Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 15.4% saturation with 435 hits. Analysis detected 2,289 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,828 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠44% (21,234 of 37,536 keywords). This John Fetterman Republican Approval Dave Mccormick Pennsylvania Poll is better (less manipulative) than 56.60% of the peer group.
John Fetterman Republican Approval Dave Mccormick Pennsylvania Poll
Keyword details
Total words: 2,828
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

43% percentile
025507510043.4% percentile
2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 5.2%5.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 15.4%15.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.8%4.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 15.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 3.7%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.0%Begging the Question: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.7%Indoctrination: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos