Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video397 analyzed words
BS Summary: These John Carreyrou results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Halo Effect, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 57.6% saturation with 686 hits. Analysis detected 3,472 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,191 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 10.8% and a BS Rank of 96% (1,670 of 37,536 keywords). This John Carreyrou is worse (more manipulative) than 95.60% of the peer group.
John Carreyrou
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
96%John Carreyrou (selected)11%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,191
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

96% percentile
025507510095.6% percentile
10.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 57.6%57.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 42.7%42.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 24.4%24.4%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Keyword 17.8%17.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 29.6%29.6%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Keyword 13.3%13.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 21.7%21.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 12.3%12.3%Genetic FallacySitewide 1.4%Keyword 9.7%9.7%Horn EffectSitewide 1.0%Keyword 6.0%6.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Framing Effect: Keyword 57.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 42.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 29.6%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 24.4%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 21.7%, sitewide 11.1%Loss Aversion: Keyword 17.8%, sitewide 2.5%Begging the Question: Keyword 13.3%, sitewide 1.7%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 12.3%, sitewide 4.0%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 1.4%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 8.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 3.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.9%Ad Hominem: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 2.2%Horn Effect: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 1.0%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 2.2%Straw Man: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 0.9%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Composition/Division: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.2%Middle Ground: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.1%Burden of Proof: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos