Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 410 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Johannesburg results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Appeal to Authority , and Self-Serving Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 18.5% saturation with 303 hits . Analysis detected 1,484 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,640 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.5% and a BS Rank of 77% (8,879 of 37,536 keywords). This Johannesburg is worse (more manipulative) than 76.30% of the peer group. Johannesburg
Keyword details
Total words: 1,640
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
76% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 76.3% percentile 4.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 18.5% 18.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 11.1% 11.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 6.9% 6.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 6.7% 6.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 5.5% 5.5% Composition/Division Sitewide 0.2% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 18.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 11.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 6.7% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 3.7% Anecdotal: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 5.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.9% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.9% Composition/Division: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.2% Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.8% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst