Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,059 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Joe Concha results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Negativity Bias , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 16.3% saturation with 692 hits . Analysis detected 5,530 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,236 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 59% (15,473 of 37,536 keywords). This Joe Concha is worse (more manipulative) than 58.80% of the peer group. Joe Concha
Keyword details
Total words: 4,236
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
59% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 58.8% percentile 3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 10.3% 10.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 15.0% 15.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.3% 10.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 16.3% 16.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 8.2% 8.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 16.3%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 15.0%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 4.6% Ad Hominem: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 2.2% Slippery Slope: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 1.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Straw Man: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 0.9% Indoctrination: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.4% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 3.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst