Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video701 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jewish Voice For Peace results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 19.2% saturation with 404 hits. Analysis detected 3,118 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,103 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.8% and a BS Rank of 79% (8,084 of 37,536 keywords). This Jewish Voice For Peace is worse (more manipulative) than 78.50% of the peer group.
Jewish Voice For Peace
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
79%Jewish Voice For Peace (selected)5%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,103
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

79% percentile
025507510078.5% percentile
4.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Keyword 11.3%11.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 19.2%19.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 9.1%9.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Keyword 5.8%5.8%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Keyword 4.4%4.4%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Keyword 4.7%4.7%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 3.5%3.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 19.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 17.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 11.5%, sitewide 8.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 11.3%, sitewide 2.0%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 1.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 2.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 5.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 3.1%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 1.1%Burden of Proof: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 0.4%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 4.0%Begging the Question: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 1.7%Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.3%Circular Reasoning: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 2.7%Horn Effect: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos