Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,151 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jet Fuel Prices results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Self-Serving Bias, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.9% saturation with 358 hits. Analysis detected 2,741 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,006 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 32% (24,404 of 35,668 keywords). This Jet Fuel Prices is better (less manipulative) than 68.40% of the peer group.
Jet Fuel Prices
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
32%Jet Fuel Prices (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,006
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

32% percentile
025507510031.6% percentile
2.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 5.6%5.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 8.9%8.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.1%2.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.7%2.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 3.3%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 3.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.0%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.1%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos