Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos932 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jesse Watters results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias, Negativity Bias, and Framing Effect, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 29.5% saturation with 1,098 hits. Analysis detected 6,338 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,728 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of 70% (11,094 of 36,903 keywords). This Jesse Watters is worse (more manipulative) than 69.90% of the peer group.
Jesse Watters
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
70%Jesse Watters (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,728
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

70% percentile
025507510069.9% percentile
4.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 29.4%29.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 11.0%11.0%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 12.8%12.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.0%1.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 8.9%8.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 11.4%11.4%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Keyword 10.3%10.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 9.4%9.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.8%2.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 29.4%, sitewide 8.1%Framing Effect: Keyword 11.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 15.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 12.8%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 11.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 3.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 9.1%Indoctrination: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 0.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 5.2%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.0%False Dilemma: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 1.5%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 4.0%Slippery Slope: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Composition/Division: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.2%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos