Keyword summary
91% 1 analyzed article/video 555 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jason Smith results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Confirmation Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 19.7% saturation with 328 hits . Analysis detected 2,733 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,665 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.8% and a BS Rank of 79% (7,973 of 37,536 keywords). This Jason Smith is worse (more manipulative) than 78.80% of the peer group. Jason Smith
Keyword details
Total words: 1,665
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
79% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 78.8% percentile 4.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 9.1% 9.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 15.2% 15.2% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 19.7% 19.7% Genetic Fallacy Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 6.9% 6.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 8.3% 8.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Keyword 5.5% 5.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 19.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 18.1%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 15.2%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 9.1% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 3.7% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 8.1% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 1.4% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 6.7% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 4.0% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Begging the Question: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 1.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 5.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 2.7% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 4.6% Burden of Proof: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 0.4% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Indoctrination: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 0.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.8% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst