Keyword summary
98%2 analyzed articles/videos914 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jason Rantz results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Negativity Bias, and Framing Effect, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 26.9% saturation with 738 hits. Analysis detected 5,021 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,742 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.6% and a BS Rank of 77% (8,760 of 37,536 keywords). This Jason Rantz is worse (more manipulative) than 76.70% of the peer group.
Jason Rantz
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
77%Jason Rantz (selected)5%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,742
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

77% percentile
025507510076.7% percentile
4.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 26.9%26.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 14.6%14.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 18.9%18.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 13.5%13.5%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Keyword 8.2%8.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 8.2%8.2%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Keyword 6.6%6.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.3%1.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.2%2.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 14.6%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 26.9%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Keyword 17.3%, sitewide 19.2%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 18.9%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 13.5%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 11.4%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 11.1%Burden of Proof: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 0.4%Anecdotal: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 5.2%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 1.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 4.6%Recency Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 2.7%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.1%Straw Man: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.2%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate