Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video420 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jane Doe 4 results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Ad Hominem, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 23.3% saturation with 391 hits. Analysis detected 2,186 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,680 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.4% and a BS Rank of 83% (6,105 of 34,832 keywords). This Jane Doe 4 is worse (more manipulative) than 82.50% of the peer group.
Jane Doe 4
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
83%Jane Doe 4 (selected)6%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,680
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

83% percentile
025507510082.5% percentile
5.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 14.1%14.1%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Keyword 8.5%8.5%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 9.8%9.8%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Keyword 7.6%7.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 5.4%5.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.8%3.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 4.0%4.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 23.3%23.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 12.0%12.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 3.9%3.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 14.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 23.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 12.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 11.1%Ad Hominem: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 2.2%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 9.1%Burden of Proof: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 0.4%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 8.1%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 1.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 5.2%Recency Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 2.7%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.4%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.8%Indoctrination: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.0%Circular Reasoning: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos