Keyword summary
â 91% 1 analyzed article/video 342 analyzed words
BS Summary: These James Walkinshaw results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Confirmation Bias , and Negativity Bias , with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 21.2% saturation with 218 hits . Analysis detected 1,391 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,026 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.8% and a BS Rank of â 79% (7,921 of 37,536 keywords). This James Walkinshaw is worse (more manipulative) than 78.90% of the peer group. James Walkinshaw
Keyword details
Total words: 1,026
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
79% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 78.9% percentile 4.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 21.3% 21.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 16.5% 16.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.4% 10.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Keyword 6.5% 6.5% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 4.9% 4.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.4% 4.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 16.5%, sitewide 26.9% Ad Hominem: Keyword 21.3%, sitewide 2.2% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 10.4%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 6.7% Burden of Proof: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 0.4% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 5.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 0.8% Begging the Question: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 1.7% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 1.4% Indoctrination: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 2.7% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.0% Straw Man: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst