Keyword summary
â 0% 1 analyzed article/video 570 analyzed words
BS Summary: These James Vukelich Kaagegaabaw results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Appeal to Authority , and Optimism Bias , with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 27.7% saturation with 474 hits . Analysis detected 2,151 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,710 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6% and a BS Rank of â 87% (5,171 of 37,536 keywords). This James Vukelich Kaagegaabaw is worse (more manipulative) than 86.20% of the peer group. James Vukelich Kaagegaabaw
Keyword details
Total words: 1,710
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
86% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 86.2% percentile 6.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 27.7% 27.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 9.1% 9.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 14.5% 14.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 15.0% 15.0% Representativeness Heuris⌠Sitewide 1.9% Keyword 8.8% 8.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 14.6% 14.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% In-Group Bias: Keyword 27.7%, sitewide 6.9% Framing Effect: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 15.0%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 14.6%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 14.5%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 9.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 1.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 7.5% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 4.0% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 1.4% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.2% Appeal to Nature: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.2% Composition/Division: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.2% Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.9% Special Pleading: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst