Keyword summary
94%1 analyzed article/video963 analyzed words
BS Summary: These James Kirk results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Framing Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 40.4% saturation with 1,166 hits. Analysis detected 4,402 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,889 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.8% and a BS Rank of 79% (8,141 of 37,536 keywords). This James Kirk is worse (more manipulative) than 78.30% of the peer group.
James Kirk
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
79%James Kirk (selected)5%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,889
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

78% percentile
025507510078.3% percentile
4.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 40.4%40.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 11.0%11.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.9%3.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 9.4%9.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 9.4%9.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.9%2.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Circular ReasoningSitewide 0.1%Keyword 3.6%3.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 5.7%5.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 40.4%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Keyword 11.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 11.3%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 11.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 0.8%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 6.7%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 4.0%Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Circular Reasoning: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 0.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 3.3%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos