Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 94 analyzed words
BS Summary: These James Comer results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Self-Serving Bias , and Anecdotal , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.7% saturation with 436 hits . Analysis detected 2,607 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,076 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 35% (23,101 of 35,068 keywords). This James Comer is better (less manipulative) than 65.90% of the peer group. James Comer
Keyword details
Total words: 4,076
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
34% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 34.1% percentile 2.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.7% 10.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 3.7% Anecdotal: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.1% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.8% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.4% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.5% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst