Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,408 analyzed words
BS Summary: These James Carville results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 24.6% saturation with 1,383 hits . Analysis detected 10,416 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,632 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of 71% (10,899 of 37,536 keywords). This James Carville is worse (more manipulative) than 71.00% of the peer group. James Carville
Keyword details
Total words: 5,632
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
71% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 71.0% percentile 4.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 24.6% 24.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 10.3% 10.3% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 9.3% 9.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 20.9% 20.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 5.4% 5.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 10.7% 10.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 20.9%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 24.6%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Keyword 20.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 10.7%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 13.1%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 11.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 1.4% Ad Hominem: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 2.2% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 1.5% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.0% Indoctrination: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 0.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 0.0% Slippery Slope: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 1.7% Straw Man: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 0.9% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Begging the Question: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst