Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,312 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jagodzianka results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Biased Writer Voice, and Halo Effect, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 10.6% saturation with 555 hits. Analysis detected 4,578 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,248 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 47% (18,880 of 35,223 keywords). This Jagodzianka is better (less manipulative) than 53.60% of the peer group.
Jagodzianka
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
47%Jagodzianka (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 5,248
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

46% percentile
025507510046.4% percentile
2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.7%2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 5.6%5.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 5.0%5.0%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 4.1%4.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 10.6%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 5.2%In-Group Bias: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 6.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 0.8%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 0.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos