Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video830 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jacob Fendley results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Anecdotal, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.5% saturation with 414 hits. Analysis detected 2,057 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,320 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠17% (31,363 of 37,536 keywords). This Jacob Fendley is better (less manipulative) than 83.60% of the peer group.
Jacob Fendley
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠17%Jacob Fendley (selected)2%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,320
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

16% percentile
025507510016.4% percentile
1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.6%3.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 12.5%12.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.7%3.7%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 1.2%1.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.0%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Primacy Effect: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%Red Herring: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos