Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,753 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jack Nicholson results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Representativeness Heuristic , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 50.1% saturation with 1,144 hits . Analysis detected 4,824 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,284 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7% and a BS Rank of 90% (3,858 of 37,536 keywords). This Jack Nicholson is worse (more manipulative) than 89.70% of the peer group. Jack Nicholson
Keyword details
Total words: 2,284
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
90% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 89.7% percentile 7.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 50.1% 50.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 23.9% 23.9% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 9.2% 9.2% Representativeness Heuris… Sitewide 1.9% Keyword 19.2% 19.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Keyword 10.8% 10.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 26.6% 26.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Keyword 6.3% 6.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 5.2% 5.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 50.1%, sitewide 8.1% Framing Effect: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 26.6%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 23.9%, sitewide 5.3% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 19.2%, sitewide 1.9% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 11.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 10.8%, sitewide 3.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 9.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 5.2% In-Group Bias: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 6.9% False Dilemma: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 1.5% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 6.0% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 1.1% Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.5% Appeal to Nature: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst