Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,020 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Israel-Palestine results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Left Leaning Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Negativity Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 38.4% saturation with 1,567 hits. Analysis detected 9,784 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,080 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.7% and a BS Rank of 89% (4,233 of 37,536 keywords). This Israel-Palestine is worse (more manipulative) than 88.70% of the peer group.
Israel-Palestine
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
89%Israel-Palestine (selected)7%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,080
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

89% percentile
025507510088.7% percentile
6.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Keyword 36.8%36.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 38.4%38.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 34.7%34.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 9.4%9.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 21.0%21.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 29.9%29.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 7.8%7.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Keyword 5.7%5.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 38.4%, sitewide 8.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 36.8%, sitewide 2.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 34.7%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Keyword 29.9%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 26.9%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 21.0%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 13.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 9.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 3.3%Ad Hominem: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 1.7%Anecdotal: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 4.0%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.0%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos