Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Israel Bonds results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Politically Left Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 16.5% saturation with 699 hits. Analysis detected 5,264 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,236 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 35,444 keywords). This Israel Bonds is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Israel Bonds
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
0%Israel Bonds (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,236
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Keyword 16.5%16.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 14.0%14.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 9.6%9.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.9%4.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.8%0.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Keyword 4.9%4.9%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 14.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 19.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 16.5%, sitewide 2.0%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 15.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 5.2%Begging the Question: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 1.7%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%Straw Man: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos