Keyword summary
0%4 analyzed articles/videos2,301 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Islamic State results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 30.3% saturation with 2,368 hits. Analysis detected 12,058 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,825 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of 70% (10,799 of 35,846 keywords). This Islamic State is worse (more manipulative) than 69.90% of the peer group.
Islamic State
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
70%Islamic State (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 7,825
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

70% percentile
025507510069.9% percentile
4.0% BS Score4 analyzed articles7.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 16.1%16.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.8%3.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.2%1.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 10.6%10.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 5.6%5.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 30.3%30.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 2.5%2.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 30.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 18.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 16.1%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 13.7%, sitewide 15.9%In-Group Bias: Keyword 10.6%, sitewide 6.9%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 4.6%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 3.1%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Red Herring: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate