Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video861 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Isap Office results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 25.4% saturation with 1,095 hits. Analysis detected 4,984 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,305 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of 73% (10,491 of 37,536 keywords). This Isap Office is worse (more manipulative) than 72.10% of the peer group.
Isap Office
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
73%Isap Office (selected)5%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,305
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

72% percentile
025507510072.1% percentile
4.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 25.4%25.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 14.4%14.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 8.4%8.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.6%3.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.5%0.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.7%3.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 4.1%4.1%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Keyword 5.6%5.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 14.4%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 25.4%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Keyword 18.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 2.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 5.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 0.5%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.5%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos