Keyword summary
⁠57%1 analyzed article/video1,743 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Irgc Proscription results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Negativity Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 23.8% saturation with 1,662 hits. Analysis detected 5,996 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,972 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠67% (16,689 of 49,306 keywords). This Irgc Proscription is worse (more manipulative) than 66.20% of the peer group.
Irgc Proscription
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Property Transfers1%
⁠0%Madison Township1%
⁠0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
⁠0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠67%Irgc Proscription (selected)4%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 6,972
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

66% percentile
025507510066.2% percentile
3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 23.8%23.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.3%4.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 10.6%10.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 16.1%16.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 0.5%0.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 2.1%2.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 23.8%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.6%, sitewide 19.2%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 16.1%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Burden of Proof: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.4%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.7%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.1%Special Pleading: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos