Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Iran War Us Pakistan Ceasefire What To Know results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Optimism Bias, and Unattributed Quote, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 7.1% saturation with 217 hits. Analysis detected 1,584 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,036 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Iran War Us Pakistan Ceasefire What To Know is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Iran War Us Pakistan Ceasefire What To Know
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 3,036
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 7.2%7.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 7.1%7.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Keyword 3.6%3.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 2.1%2.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.8%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.4%Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.6%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos